[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows 64 port
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: Windows 64 port |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:50:03 +0100 |
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 20:16, Aurélien <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> As i ask #wikipedia on irc.freenode.net ok so if it is an operating
> system, where is the iso? at this time they search ...
>
> But they don't correct the title and the article ... so imagine, most of
> people coming from windows and apple which try to have some information
> about what they know ... most of time Linux, they just rarely, for
> "best" of them find the true.
>
> Neuro marketing victims ... maybe but not only.
>
> At this time, in front the true, wikipedia have not correct the article,
> and have not correct the title.
Please go to the article in Wikipedia and discuss it there. I think
that is the way to get it corrected.
- Re: Windows 64 port, (continued)
- Re: Windows 64 port, Stefan Monnier, 2012/02/21
- Re: Windows 64 port, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/21
- Re: Windows 64 port, Richard Stallman, 2012/02/22
- Re: Windows 64 port, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/02/22
- Re: Windows 64 port, Richard Stallman, 2012/02/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Aurélien, 2012/02/23
- Re: Windows 64 port,
Lennart Borgman <=
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/02/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Aurélien, 2012/02/24
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/02/28
- Re: Windows 64 port, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/28
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/02/28
- Re: Windows 64 port, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/02/29
- Re: Windows 64 port, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/29
- Re: Windows 64 port, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/02/29
- Re: Windows 64 port, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/29
- Re: Windows 64 port, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/02/29