Re: Windows 64 port

[Fabrice Popineau]

The situation with the INT_RANGE_OVERFLOW check is similar, except
there the macro is more like this:

 #define a 2147483647
 #define b 1
 #define FOO (INT_ADD_OVERFLOW (a,b) ? INT_MAX : (a)+(b))
 int i = FOO;

Again, any compiler that warns about potential overflow of
2147483647+1 should be ignored, because the _expression_
2147483647+1 cannot possibly be evaluated.

Ok. I read the intprops.h file and I agree with this example.

Pity there is no other (simpler) way to handle this.

Thanks for the explanations.

Fabrice

--
Fabrice Popineau

-----------------------------

SUPELEC

Département Informatique

3, rue Joliot Curie

91192 Gif/Yvette Cedex

Tel direct : +33 (0) 169851950

Standard : +33 (0) 169851212

------------------------------