[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs and Guile
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs and Guile |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:09:40 +0300 |
> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:26:11 +0200 (CEST)
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> From: Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden>
>
>
> > FWIW, my (admittedly short) experience with Guile is that it is not
> > reliable or stable on anything but GNU/Linux, and even there it has
> > much to catch up. It has a lot to gain in terms of portability
> > before it can be considered seriously as an alternative to ELisp, or
> > even its sibling on equal rights. [...]
>
> We use it quite successfully in LilyPond which runs on Macs, Windows
> boxes, and various UNIX flavours. Right now, we have about 1.3MByte
> of Scheme code. This is Guile 1.8.x, but we are already in the
> process of migrating to 2.x.
2.x is quite different, I'm told. My experience is with 2.x only.
> LilyPond binaries for Mac and Windows are cross-compiled on a
> GNU/Linux box.
I don't think this matters. The problems I had were not with the
configury and the build procedure -- that worked pretty much
seamlessly. The problem was with missing features on that are needed
for running the binaries on MS-Window. Cross-compilation cannot fix
that.
> So people working on a forthcoming Scheme support in Emacs might have
> a look at LilyPond.
Yes, by all means. Any experience should be carefully studied.
- GSoC projects related to Emacs, Bastien, 2012/04/09
- Re: Emacs and Guile, BT Templeton, 2012/04/10
- Re: Emacs and Guile, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/11
- Re: Emacs and Guile, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2012/04/11
- Re: Emacs and Guile, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/11
- RE: Emacs and Guile, Drew Adams, 2012/04/11
- Re: Emacs and Guile, BT Templeton, 2012/04/11
- RE: Emacs and Guile, Drew Adams, 2012/04/11