[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patch to rmail.el and sendmail.el needs to go in 24.1.
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Patch to rmail.el and sendmail.el needs to go in 24.1. |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:25:40 -0400 |
> Since it avoids a dangerous bug, it ought to go in 24.1.
> Can someone please put it there?
You should have put it there in the first place.
Please forgive me. With my rudimentary knowledge of using Bzr -- I
only know how to work with the trunk -- I had no idea it would make a
difference which place the patch gets installed first. I don't know
why it makes a difference, but please don't explain; I will take your
word for that.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call
- Patch to rmail.el and sendmail.el needs to go in 24.1., Richard Stallman, 2012/04/17
- Re: Patch to rmail.el and sendmail.el needs to go in 24.1., Andreas Schwab, 2012/04/18
- Re: Patch to rmail.el and sendmail.el needs to go in 24.1.,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Patch to rmail.el and sendmail.el needs to go in 24.1., Andreas Schwab, 2012/04/18
- Re: Patch to rmail.el and sendmail.el needs to go in 24.1., Paul Eggert, 2012/04/18
- Re: Patch to rmail.el and sendmail.el needs to go in 24.1., Richard Stallman, 2012/04/19
- Re: Patch to rmail.el and sendmail.el needs to go in 24.1., Paul Eggert, 2012/04/20
- Re: Patch to rmail.el and sendmail.el needs to go in 24.1., Glenn Morris, 2012/04/20
- Re: Patch to rmail.el and sendmail.el needs to go in 24.1., Paul Eggert, 2012/04/20
- Re: Patch to rmail.el and sendmail.el needs to go in 24.1., Richard Stallman, 2012/04/21