[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal: block-based vector allocator
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal: block-based vector allocator |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Jun 2012 17:26:23 +0300 |
> Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 23:49:33 -0700
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> > In this situation, saying that w32heap.c is "confused" is really being
> > facetious, to say the least.
>
> I would rather not have the w32heap.c issue slow things down, so I
> will revise the patch to leave w32heap.c alone. Any problems that
> w32heap.c has will be independent of the revised patch.
When/if the issue is sufficiently well documented in lisp.h, perhaps
even I will understand what's wrong about w32heap.c.
- Re: Proposal: block-based vector allocator, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/06/01
- Re: Proposal: block-based vector allocator, Stefan Monnier, 2012/06/01
- Re: Proposal: block-based vector allocator, Stefan Monnier, 2012/06/01
- Re: Proposal: block-based vector allocator, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/06/06
- Re: Proposal: block-based vector allocator, Stefan Monnier, 2012/06/06
- Re: Proposal: block-based vector allocator, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/06/06
- Re: Proposal: block-based vector allocator, Stefan Monnier, 2012/06/06
- Re: Proposal: block-based vector allocator, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/06/07
- Re: Proposal: block-based vector allocator, Stefan Monnier, 2012/06/07
- Re: Proposal: block-based vector allocator, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/06/08