Re: async 1.0

[John Wiegley]

>>>>> Samuel Bronson <address@hidden> writes:

> I've long thought Emacs should keep the backtrace along with the
> error/condition/exception (whichever you want to call it), like Python does:
> the way things are now is fairly painful even for single-process debugging,
> in all but the simplest cases.  Captured backtraces would allow the user to
> manually examine only those errors that they are actually interested in, and
> should permit handlers to augment them with additional information before
> re-throwing.

I agree.  Does anybody with experience in this area know how difficult this
would be to add?

John