[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why (substring "abc" 0 4) does not return "abc" instead of an error?
|
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
|
Subject: |
Re: Why (substring "abc" 0 4) does not return "abc" instead of an error? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:40:03 +0200 |
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> wrote:
> That's not much different from ("foo" == "foo") in C. Using eq for
> comparing non-atoms is seldom useful.
I know that, and I acknowledged it's not a bug. It's just weird that a
progression like that, in which just an index is varying, suddenly
changes result. But I know full well why does it happen.
Juanma
- Re: Why (substring "abc" 0 4) does not return "abc" instead of an error?, (continued)
- Re: Why (substring "abc" 0 4) does not return "abc" instead of an error?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2012/07/16
- Re: Why (substring "abc" 0 4) does not return "abc" instead of an error?, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/16
- Re: Why (substring "abc" 0 4) does not return "abc" instead of an error?, Lennart Borgman, 2012/07/16
- Re: Why (substring "abc" 0 4) does not return "abc" instead of an error?, Bastien, 2012/07/16
- Re: Why (substring "abc" 0 4) does not return "abc" instead of an error?, Lennart Borgman, 2012/07/16
- Re: Why (substring "abc" 0 4) does not return "abc" instead of an error?, Andreas Schwab, 2012/07/16
- Re: Why (substring "abc" 0 4) does not return "abc" instead of an error?,
Juanma Barranquero <=