[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Extra info about 109170
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Extra info about 109170 |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Jul 2012 18:18:44 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 05:57:20 -0400
>
> > I'd appreciate if someone could explain why are we excited about 8%
> > speedup, and on top of that in massive byte-compiling (something that
> > can hardly be described as a frequent operation).
>
> 8% speedup in an actual run of Emacs is a pretty good speed up for such
> a small change.
Any speedup is good. I just don't see how speeding up kill-buffer is
something people should be using up their time for. But I guess we
cannot tell people which itch to scratch.
- Extra info about 109170, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/07/20
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/21
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/07/21
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/22
- Re: Extra info about 109170,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/23
- Re: Extra info about 109170, joakim, 2012/07/23
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Nix, 2012/07/23
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/07/23
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/23
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/07/24
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/24
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/07/24
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/25