[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing? |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Oct 2012 08:43:38 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: Ken Brown <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:04:38 -0400
>
> > This just means NSTATIC should be bumped up again (which Daniel
> > already did, I see).
>
> > I think going from 0x650 to 0x1000 is too much. But I'll let Stefan
> > decide.
>
> I'm not too worried about those 20KB, but yes, 0x800 sounds like
> a better choice.
Done.
- Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, (continued)
- Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, Nix, 2012/10/17
- Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, Ken Brown, 2012/10/18
- Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, Daniel Colascione, 2012/10/18
- Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, Ken Brown, 2012/10/18
- Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/18
- Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, Stefan Monnier, 2012/10/18
- Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, Angelo Graziosi, 2012/10/19
Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, Angelo Graziosi, 2012/10/20
Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/20
Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, Ken Brown, 2012/10/20