Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic

[Miguel Guedes]

On 04/12/12 00:40, Richard Stallman wrote:
> No, the AGPL covers the case of giving people remote access to use a
> program.

Shouldn't an effort then be made to create a software license or 
tweak/upgrade an existing one to ensure free software cannot be used in 
ways that go against its very philosophy?

I understand your wish to ensure free software remains free not matter 
what, but restricting the freedom of users of free software should not 
be the solution; in fact this sounds like a contradiction in itself. How 
can placing restrictions on what's supposed to be free ever be part of 
the solution?

--
Miguel