[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?
From: |
Sébastien Delafond |
Subject: |
Re: Dual licensing of Org manual? |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:02:21 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Dec/14, Bastien wrote:
> > It's possible that the GNU position may have softened wrt
> > invariant sections and cover texts. GFDL with no invariant
> > sections and no cover texts is acceptable for Debian "free" IIUC.
>
> Sebastien, do you confirm this?
that is correct, per http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001.
Cheers,
--Seb
- Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/13
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Glenn Morris, 2012/12/13
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/13
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/15
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/15
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/16
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bill Wohler, 2012/12/19
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/19
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/20