Re: is requiring cl bad?

[Xue Fuqiao]

On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 10:29:30 +0100
Ivan Kanis <address@hidden> wrote:

> I was under the impression that requiring cl was bad (TM). I can't
> remember why. Is it still so?

You can see these pages:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2003-08/msg00436.html
http://www.gnu.org/gnu/rms-lisp.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-09/msg01472.html

BTW, what does "TM" mean(English is not my native language)?
-- 
Best regards, Xue Fuqiao.
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/XueFuqiao