[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Dual licensing of Org manual? |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:08:09 -0500 |
Just out of curiosity, was it needed for the MH-E manual?
If so, what was the need?
I don't know how this decision was made, but I doubt there was a real
need. I think it was some sort of confusion. It makes no sense
to undo it now, but we can avoid other similar confusions from now on.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, (continued)
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/15
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/15
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/16
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bill Wohler, 2012/12/19
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/19
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/20
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bill Wohler, 2012/12/20
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/20
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/21
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/14