[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Naming internal functions
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: Naming internal functions |
|
Date: |
Mon, 15 Apr 2013 17:25:13 +0300 |
> From: Christopher Schmidt <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:14:54 +0100 (BST)
>
> thanks for your feedback.
You're welcome.
> > (Not that I think "objects" is good terminology in this context, but
> > just to show you the principle.)
>
> What's the right terminology?
"Symbol", I guess.
- Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, (continued)
- Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, Bastien, 2013/04/15
- Naming internal functions (was: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?), Christopher Schmidt, 2013/04/08
- Re: Naming internal functions, Stefan Monnier, 2013/04/08
- Re: Naming internal functions, Christopher Schmidt, 2013/04/15
- Re: Naming internal functions, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/15
- Re: Naming internal functions, Christopher Schmidt, 2013/04/15
- Re: Naming internal functions,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Naming internal functions, Christopher Schmidt, 2013/04/15
- Re: Naming internal functions, xfq, 2013/04/15
Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2013/04/08
Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2013/04/10
Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, Thorsten Jolitz, 2013/04/10
Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, Leo Liu, 2013/04/09