Re: trunk r112976: * lisp/subr.el (with-eval-after-load): New

[Stefan Monnier]

> I think loading.texi needs some further changes.  The last paragraph
> ("Normally, well-designed Lisp programs should not use
> `eval-after-load'...") is superfluous.  My reasons:

> 1. `eval-after-load' isn't documented any more.  This paragraph is
> somewhat suprising to readers who did not know this function before;

The wording should be made more general so as to include eval-after-load
and with-eval-after-load (and eval-next-after-load).

> 2. (info "(elisp) Coding Conventions") has already stated that the use
> of `eval-after-load' isn't recommended.

Repetition is not bad,


        Stefan