[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: eww
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: eww |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:50:58 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Lars> Would it make more sense for eww to use new buffers every time? eww
Lars> would have a backlog of, say, ten buffers, and going back to the
Lars> previous page would just mean popping to the previous buffer. And it
Lars> could use `bury-buffer' and rename the previous buffer to a name with
Lars> something leading with " " when you go to a new page.
FWIW w3m reuses the buffer by default, but lets you request a new buffer
when following a link. That is, it works like other web browsers, where
a click usually reuses the tab, and middle-click or whatever opens a new
one.
Tom
- Re: eww, (continued)
- Re: eww, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Christopher Schmidt, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, chad, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Juri Linkov, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Tom Tromey, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww,
Tom Tromey <=
- Re: eww, Tom Tromey, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Christopher Schmidt, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Steinar Bang, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Tom Tromey, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/18
Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Tom Tromey, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/18