[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)) |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jul 2013 06:12:48 -0400 |
[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider
[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,
[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example.
Ok. But all my namespace proposal is, is basically this, with automatic
'load-read-alias'.
The virtue of my proposal is that it does not change the meaning of
symbols, obarrays, or any built-in functions. It has no effect on any
file that doesn't use it, so it can't break anything, and if you don't
choose to use this facility, you don't need to know about it.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), (continued)
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Richard Stallman, 2013/07/27
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Nic Ferrier, 2013/07/27
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Bastien, 2013/07/27
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), David Engster, 2013/07/27
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Nic Ferrier, 2013/07/27
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Richard Stallman, 2013/07/27
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Nic Ferrier, 2013/07/28
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Jambunathan K, 2013/07/28
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Richard Stallman, 2013/07/28
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Nic Ferrier, 2013/07/28
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)),
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Nic Ferrier, 2013/07/29
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Richard Stallman, 2013/07/29
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system, Lars Brinkhoff, 2013/07/27
- RE: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Drew Adams, 2013/07/26
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Juanma Barranquero, 2013/07/26
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2013/07/26
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Nic Ferrier, 2013/07/26
Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?), Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2013/07/26
Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?), Richard Stallman, 2013/07/27
Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?), Stefan Monnier, 2013/07/26