[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Changes in revision 114466
From: |
Xue Fuqiao |
Subject: |
Re: Changes in revision 114466 |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Oct 2013 11:40:16 +0800 |
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Drew Adams <address@hidden> wrote:
> But the statement that every user option and command needs
> documentation does not speak about manuals. In any case, that's how I
> understood it: these things need documentation.
Sorry for being unclear. Actually, I _do_ (and _did_) mean the
documentation in the manuals (*.texi).
> What we might want/need (I have proposed this several times, and so have
> others) is linking from doc strings to the manuals. That would indeed be
> useful, IMO. It would provide missing glue, as you put it.
>
> There are a very few doc strings, IIRC, that actually do this. It would
> be good to generalize it, or at least make use of it more.
+1
--
Best regards, Xue Fuqiao.
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
- Re: Changes in revision 114466, (continued)
- Re: Changes in revision 114466, Xue Fuqiao, 2013/09/30
- RE: Changes in revision 114466, Drew Adams, 2013/09/30
- Re: Changes in revision 114466, Stephen Berman, 2013/09/30
- RE: Changes in revision 114466, Drew Adams, 2013/09/30
- Re: Changes in revision 114466, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2013/09/30
- RE: Changes in revision 114466, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/09/30
- Re: Changes in revision 114466, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/09/30
- Re: Changes in revision 114466, Andreas Röhler, 2013/09/30
- Re: Changes in revision 114466, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/09/30
- RE: Changes in revision 114466, Drew Adams, 2013/09/30
- Re: Changes in revision 114466,
Xue Fuqiao <=