Re: [Emacs-diffs] trunk r114556: * test/indent/ruby.rb: Fix a spurious change, add more failing examples.

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 08.10.2013 06:37, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> When you're right after the newline that follows the "if" and you call
> ruby-smie--backward-token do you then get ";" (and move to right after
> the "if") or do you get "iuwu-mod" (and move to right before the "if")?

The latter.

> BTW, I don't guarantee that fixing ruby-smie--implicit-semi-p for this
> case will give you the intended effect, but without it it'll be
> difficult to get the intended effect: as it stands, SMIE considers the
> newline after "if" to terminate the instruction, so the next instruction
> is of course aligned with the previous one, and changing that in the
> smie-rules part would invariably break other indentation cases.

Thanks, I think I've fixed that with the change to ruby-smie-rules in 
114587.

By the way, could you explain what does the `when' predicate in (:before 
. "do") rule in ruby-smie-rules do?

If I remove the `when' and just leave (smie-rule-parent), none of the 
indentation examples break, AFAICS.