emacs-devel
[
Top
][
All Lists
]
Advanced
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: the state of the concurrency branch
From
:
Barry OReilly
Subject
:
Re: the state of the concurrency branch
Date
:
Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:07:37 -0400
> I think a typical reason to do this kind of funny business is to
> communicate from the timer (or process filter or whatever) back to
> the caller.
For this use case, wouldn't a feature for thread futures be appropriate?
reply via email to
[
Prev in Thread
]
Current Thread
[
Next in Thread
]
Re: the state of the concurrency branch
,
(continued)
Re: the state of the concurrency branch
,
Barry OReilly
,
2013/10/16
Re: the state of the concurrency branch
,
Tom Tromey
,
2013/10/17
Re: the state of the concurrency branch
,
Tom Tromey
,
2013/10/17
Re: the state of the concurrency branch
,
Stefan Monnier
,
2013/10/18
Re: the state of the concurrency branch
,
Tom Tromey
,
2013/10/18
Re: the state of the concurrency branch
,
Richard Stallman
,
2013/10/19
Re: the state of the concurrency branch
,
Barry OReilly
,
2013/10/19
Re: the state of the concurrency branch
,
Stefan Monnier
,
2013/10/19
Re: the state of the concurrency branch
,
Barry OReilly
,
2013/10/19
Re: the state of the concurrency branch
,
Tom Tromey
,
2013/10/21
Re: the state of the concurrency branch
,
Barry OReilly
<=
Re: the state of the concurrency branch
,
Stefan Monnier
,
2013/10/21
Re: the state of the concurrency branch
,
Stefan Monnier
,
2013/10/21
Re: the state of the concurrency branch
,
Barry OReilly
,
2013/10/19
Prev by Date:
Re: Emacs and XDG Base Dir Spec was: persistent storage for Emacs packages
Next by Date:
Re: Default behaviour of RET.
Previous by thread:
Re: the state of the concurrency branch
Next by thread:
Re: the state of the concurrency branch
Index(es):
Date
Thread