[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: participation & contribution [was: Latest changes with lisp/uni-*.el
From: |
Wolfgang Jenkner |
Subject: |
Re: participation & contribution [was: Latest changes with lisp/uni-*.el and leim/quail] |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:55:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (berkeley-unix) |
On Tue, Dec 03 2013, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Wolfgang Jenkner <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Like other people I have done some experiments with local repositories
>> and there is a thing that bothers me: While, by default, `git push' to
>> some other git repo succeeds only if this would not change the history
>> of what is already in that repo, there is apparently no such safeguard
>> against rewriting history in an upstream bzr repo (and pushing to
>> a bound branch instead does not quite work).
>
> This should work properly with git-remote-bzr.
The example I gave used this remote helper (included with git 1.8.4.3).
Or did you mean my parenthetical remark?
Wolfgang
- Re: participation & contribution [was: Latest changes with lisp/uni-*.el and leim/quail], Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2013/12/01
- Re: participation & contribution [was: Latest changes with lisp/uni-*.el and leim/quail], Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2013/12/04
- Re: participation & contribution [was: Latest changes with lisp/uni-*.el and leim/quail], Andreas Schwab, 2013/12/04
- Re: participation & contribution [was: Latest changes with lisp/uni-*.el and leim/quail], Stefan Monnier, 2013/12/04
- Re: participation & contribution [was: Latest changes with lisp/uni-*.el and leim/quail], Andreas Schwab, 2013/12/04
- adventures w/ git-bzr, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2013/12/08