[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SHA, MD, and openssl
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: SHA, MD, and openssl |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 09:31:35 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Do users ever install these libraries separately from the major
> system components?
I have to ask, does this question make sense any more?
Of course it makes sense. And it has to be asked, because this is the
condition that the GPL's rule depends on.
Can we argue that OpenSSL normally accompanies Linux?
It seems like a stretch. Does Android include OpenSSL?
What about the Busybox/Linux system used in many embedded devices,
does that contain OpenSSL?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
- SHA, MD, and openssl, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/12/08
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Paul Eggert, 2013/12/08
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Richard Stallman, 2013/12/09
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/12/09
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Paul Eggert, 2013/12/10
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Richard Stallman, 2013/12/11
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Paul Eggert, 2013/12/11
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Pádraig Brady, 2013/12/11
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Glenn Morris, 2013/12/11
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/12/12
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Richard Stallman, 2013/12/12
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Pádraig Brady, 2013/12/12
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Richard Stallman, 2013/12/13
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Pádraig Brady, 2013/12/13