Re: [patch] make electric-pair-mode smarter/more useful

[Stefan Monnier]

> So a separate minor mode that on activation/deactivation adds/removes
> the rule to/from the default value of electric-layout-rules, right?

No, I was thinking of a minor mode completely independent from
electric-layout-mode.  Integrated in electric-pair-mode, instead.

> OR did you mean a new minor mode completely independent from
> electric-layout-mode, i.e., loose that 'after-stay nonsense that I proposed
> earlier.

Right (tho I wouldn't say it's non-sense, it might even be useful in
other circumstances).


        Stefan