[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req.
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req. |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Jan 2014 07:58:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
> The question is whether we should edit them separately
> from the commit messages, or if we should produce them
> by (programmatically) extracting them from the commit
> messages.
>
> I think it is best for commit messages to be brief high-level
> summaries of the changes, and put the details only in ChangeLog.
> I think that these two forms of desription complement each other
> and that it is useful to have both available.
FWIW, I fully agree.
--
Bastien
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., (continued)
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/05
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/01/05
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/05
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/01/06
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/06
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Richard Stallman, 2014/01/05
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., David Kastrup, 2014/01/05
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Glenn Morris, 2014/01/05
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/05
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/01/05
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req.,
Bastien <=
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., David Kastrup, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Florian Weimer, 2014/01/05
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Richard Stallman, 2014/01/05
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Florian Weimer, 2014/01/05
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Richard Stallman, 2014/01/06
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., David Kastrup, 2014/01/06
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/06
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2014/01/06
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/06
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., David Kastrup, 2014/01/06