Re: trunk r115926: In preparation for the move to git, sanitize out some Bazaar-specific names.

[Eric S. Raymond]

Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>:
> > I don't see any win at all in this reversion. And because doing it would
> > reintroduce a layering violation, I'm going to need a lot of convincing.
> 
> Why should I have to convince you that you shouldn't remove published
> APIs? I don't want to turn this into a silly commit battle, but if you
> don't fix it in a compatible way, I will. I'm only asking that your
> changes for the future (need I to remind you that we're still using
> Bazaar?) do not break anything that does not *need* to be broken.

Wouldn't defining emacs-bzr-get-version as an obsolete function alias
for emacs-repository-get-version solve the problem in a way 
satisfactory to both of us?

It wouldn't reintroduce a layering bug into loadup.el, and it would give you
your compatible API. 
-- 
                <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>