Re: clang vs free software

[Rüdiger Sonderfeld]

On Tuesday 21 January 2014 19:00:26 Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
> () Rüdiger Sonderfeld <address@hidden>
> () Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:34:10 +0100
> 
>    For gcc-etags to a file in etag format
>    and for the other experiment a sexp.
> 
> Why not write a server to which this plugin can send the hard-won
> information?  The server's job is to persist all those (incoming)
> goodies in a database somewhere (say, $projroot/.static-bits.db).
> Other clients can request the subset that is interesting to them,
> e.g., for etags (re)format(ting).
> 
> This architecture is HURD-friendly, too (IIUC the HURD mindset).
> GNU Serveez + Guile-PG + SMOP ... 149 lines of Scheme, max.  :-D

I think at the moment it writes a file for each code file to a subdirectory in 
the $projroot.  This could of course be changed.  But right now the project is 
in a very early stage and I didn't have the time to work on it in over a year.

Regards,
Rüdiger

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.