|Subject:||Re: clang vs free software|
|Date:||Sun, 26 Jan 2014 16:46:56 +0100|
>> +1Lennart Borgman <address@hidden> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>wrote:
>> > We don't want to make a program's entire AST available for parsing
>> > because that would make it easy to extend GCC with proprietary
>> > programs.
>> Let me just say that even tho I understand and agree with the goal,
>> I disagree.
I am glad I don't have Richard's totally ungrateful job, but then he
picked it himself.
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|