[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Progress report on git-blame
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Progress report on git-blame |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 17:14:37 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
> How do you define "that chunk of text"? For the initial (latest)
> revision, the answer is clear. But, as you go backwards in time, the
> text becomes less and less similar to what it is today, and can also
> move around.
Right, as you go backward, the region to consider grows. But the
meaning is still clear.
Stefan
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, (continued)
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/25
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/25
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/25
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/25
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/26
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/26
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/26
- Re: Progress report on git-blame,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, David Kastrup, 2014/01/26
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/26
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, David Engster, 2014/01/25
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, David Kastrup, 2014/01/25
- Re: RFC - cleaning up /etc, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/11
- Re: RFC - cleaning up /etc, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/12
- Re: RFC - cleaning up /etc, Glenn Morris, 2014/01/12