Re: [PATCH] Add GPG compatible symmetric encryption command

[Ted Zlatanov]

On Fri, 07 Feb 2014 21:24:03 +0900 Daiki Ueno <address@hidden> wrote: 

DU> All your claims look like:

DU> - <abstract function A> is useful to implement <abstract function B>

DU> and there's no mention of how <abstract function B> would be beneficial
DU> to Emacs.

As I said, I'm sorry you don't find them convincing.

Meanwhile, would you consider continuing with your patch to the point
where Lars can use it from Gnus?  As I said, I don't think it affects my
request for GnuTLS/libnettle/libhogweed primitives[1] and it would help
Lars avoid having to use an ELisp implementation of Rijndael/AES.  I
certainly would like a unified (via EPG) interface, instead of inventing
a new one.

If you're not interested in continuing, I can pick it up (either as an
EPG change or a standalone library), unless you have objections to that.

Thanks
Ted

[1] you omitted an answer to that question from your reply, so I assume
you agree.