[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp |
Date: |
Sat, 1 Mar 2014 16:50:57 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden>:
> What the developers of LLVM are doing is foolish given
> that we already had GCC:
LLVM got off the ground because GCC, by policy, refused to provide
interfaces that some toolmakers wanted. Consequently, those hackers
exercised their freedom by going around GCC rather than through it.
That may lead to an outcome you don't like, but they could with
precisely equal justification call *you* foolish for crippling GCC by
policy.
Generally, if you use the term "foolish" for people who are acting
intelligently to pursue their own objectives rather than yours, you
will mislead yourself and not affect them at all.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Stefan Monnier, 2014/03/01
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Richard Stallman, 2014/03/01
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Richard Stallman, 2014/03/01
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp,
Eric S. Raymond <=
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, David Kastrup, 2014/03/01
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/03/02
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Richard Stallman, 2014/03/03
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/03/04
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, David Kastrup, 2014/03/04
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Richard Stallman, 2014/03/10
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Stefan Monnier, 2014/03/10
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Richard Stallman, 2014/03/10
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Daniel Colascione, 2014/03/11
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Jambunathan K, 2014/03/11