Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"?

[Andreas Schwab]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

>> From: Joshua Judson Rosen <address@hidden>
>> Cc: address@hidden,  address@hidden,  address@hidden
>> Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 00:53:00 -0500
>> 
>> > > > >     revno: 111954.1.4
>> > > > >     committer: K. Handa <address@hidden>
>> > > > >     branch nick: work
>> > > > >     timestamp: Fri 2013-03-22 00:18:44 +0900
>> > > > >     message:
>> > > > >       Fix a bug introduced by revno:111954.1.97
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > It doesn't show up in a bzr log --levels=0 listing, and the fact that
>> > > > > 97 > 4 suggests the reference is garbled.
>> > > >
>> > > > I think the correct reference is 111964.1.6.  It was merged in
>> > > > r112051.
>> > > 
>> > > ... and the "revno:111954.1.97" was a reference to trunk revno:112051.
>> >
>> > No, it isn't, IMO: they have different parents.
>> 
>> They actually don't have different parents--they have the same revid,
>> and really _are_ the same revision-object.
>
> No, they haven't, and no, they aren't:
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------
>   revno: 111964.1.6

revno:111954.1.97 refers to revno:112051, not revno:111964.1.6.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."