[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: byte-compiler does *not* complain about missing case or loop
From: |
Jambunathan K |
Subject: |
Re: byte-compiler does *not* complain about missing case or loop |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Mar 2014 18:09:48 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:
> Jambunathan K <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> 2. How would I interpret the error?
>>
>> 1:40 ends points to param line but the actual error report - the
>> `marker' variable - is elsewhere.
>
> (types . marker) is a malformed function call.
The LINE:COL position of the error report is wrong.
The presence of that defun prevents the "end of data" report from being
triggered.
FWIW, see the attached report
1. With the offending defun compiled in, the "end of data" report is
*absent*.
2. With offending defun ";;"-ed out, the "end of data" report is
*present*.
I wonder what would explain the presence/absence of "end of data"
report.
with-destructuring.txt
Description: Text document
without-destructuring.txt
Description: Text document
- byte-compiler does *not* complain about missing case or loop, Jambunathan K, 2014/03/05
- Re: byte-compiler does *not* complain about missing case or loop, Stefan Monnier, 2014/03/07
- Re: byte-compiler does *not* complain about missing case or loop, Stefan Monnier, 2014/03/09
- Re: byte-compiler does *not* complain about missing case or loop, Jambunathan K, 2014/03/09
- Re: byte-compiler does *not* complain about missing case or loop, Stefan Monnier, 2014/03/10
- Re: byte-compiler does *not* complain about missing case or loop, Jambunathan K, 2014/03/10
- Re: byte-compiler does *not* complain about missing case or loop, Stefan Monnier, 2014/03/10
- Re: byte-compiler does *not* complain about missing case or loop, Jambunathan K, 2014/03/11