[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Enlarge MAX_ALLOCA?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Enlarge MAX_ALLOCA? |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 10:10:24 +0300 |
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 23:13:47 +0200
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> 64kB feels arbitrary. I cannot really think of an architecture where
> >> 64kB would be feasible and 128kB not. ±32kB is a plausible offset for
> >> some architectures.
> >
> > This has nothing to do with machine architectures.
> > It's only related to the OS chosen size of the stack.
>
> It would be "only related to stack size" when there was a strictly
> limited number of alloca allocations in the whole call stack since the
> limit is per alloca, not per Emacs invocation.
I'm not sure I follow your reasoning. Can you elaborate, please?
Re: Enlarge MAX_ALLOCA?, Stefan Monnier, 2014/06/19
Re: Enlarge MAX_ALLOCA?, Dmitry Antipov, 2014/06/20
Re: Enlarge MAX_ALLOCA?, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/20
Re: Enlarge MAX_ALLOCA?, Andreas Schwab, 2014/06/20
Re: Enlarge MAX_ALLOCA?, David Kastrup, 2014/06/20
Re: Enlarge MAX_ALLOCA?, Stefan Monnier, 2014/06/19