[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Git transition workflow
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: Git transition workflow |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Aug 2014 22:58:30 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Stephen J. Turnbull <address@hidden>:
> Paul Michael Reilly writes:
>
> > Am I wrong, and it is intuitively obvious how we are going to deal
> > with git and branches, rebasing, reviews, etc?
>
> Having observed several of these transitions, including Emacs's
> CVS->Bazaar transition, it's really not a problem as long as the git
> fans accept that several major contributors just want a CVS-like
> workflow, and git commands that implement that workflow are explained
> in straightforward terms.
Furthermore, the workflow documentation is already up on the wiki.
That's one of the first things I did.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
- Git transition workflow, Paul Michael Reilly, 2014/08/11
- Re: Git transition workflow, Richard Stallman, 2014/08/11
- Re: Git transition workflow, RĂ¼diger Sonderfeld, 2014/08/12
- Re: Git transition workflow, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2014/08/12
- Re: Git transition workflow, Achim Gratz, 2014/08/12
- Re: Git transition workflow, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/08/13
- Re: Git transition workflow, Ashton Kemerling, 2014/08/13
- Re: Git transition workflow, Sergey Organov, 2014/08/13
- Re: Git transition workflow, Stefan Monnier, 2014/08/13