[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future (was: Guile emacs thread (again))
From: |
Lars Brinkhoff |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future (was: Guile emacs thread (again)) |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:54:19 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> The only standard language into which Elisp can evolve, AFAICT, is
> Common Lisp. [ Now some readers get disappointed, while some others
> become excited. ]
Excited.
> [...] we could use Common-Lisp libraries in Emacs.
That's almost possible already, because there is a Common Lisp
implementation (say 90% complete) for Emacs, including a compiler from
CL to Elisp.
- Re: Regular expression creation [was: Re: Emacs Lisp's future], (continued)
- Re: Regular expression creation [was: Re: Emacs Lisp's future], Daniel Colascione, 2014/09/19
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Andreas Röhler, 2014/09/18
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/09/18
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Ivan Andrus, 2014/09/18
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/09/18
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Andreas Röhler, 2014/09/19
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Andreas Schwab, 2014/09/19
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/19
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future (was: Guile emacs thread (again)), Emilio Lopes, 2014/09/18
Re: Emacs Lisp's future (was: Guile emacs thread (again)), Eli Zaretskii, 2014/09/16
Re: Emacs Lisp's future (was: Guile emacs thread (again)),
Lars Brinkhoff <=
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/16
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mark H Weaver, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mark H Weaver, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mark H Weaver, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Nic Ferrier, 2014/09/17
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, mhw, 2014/09/17