[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile emacs thread (again)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Guile emacs thread (again) |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:12:44 +0300 |
> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 20:07:21 +0200
> From: Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> > Well, the "User-visible issues" there sound pretty scary to me.
> > Evidently, even building it, and even on GNU/Linux, is not without
> > problems ("it compiles and starts up if you struggle a little").
>
> Note that replacing the Elisp engine with libguile has been done just
> now; this is the first publicly available version of it
That's clear (I did a "git log" ;-). My comment was regarding the
possibility to use that seriously in its present state.
> If I understood BT Templeton (bipt) right on IRC, converting strings
> back and forth is only a temporary solution. I hope we find a way to
> merge the two string types.
That will need a lot of talking first. There are a lot of subtle
differences, and the fact that Guile based its non-ASCII support on
libunistring doesn't help.
- Re: Guile emacs thread (again), (continued)
- Re: Guile emacs thread (again), Robin Templeton, 2014/09/18
- Re: Guile emacs thread (again), Christopher Allan Webber, 2014/09/18
- Re: Guile emacs thread (again), Richard Stallman, 2014/09/20
- Re: Guile emacs thread (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2014/09/20
- Re: Guile emacs thread (again), Richard Stallman, 2014/09/21
- Re: Guile emacs thread (again), Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/21
- Re: Guile emacs thread (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2014/09/21
- Re: Guile emacs thread (again), Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/21
Re: Guile emacs thread (again), Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer, 2014/09/16
- Re: Guile emacs thread (again),
Eli Zaretskii <=