[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Nic Ferrier |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Sep 2014 19:10:15 +0100 |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> And I think that apart from reestablishing that I am a dishonest
> manipulative asshole who does not know what he is talking about, we got
> some insights into the current state of GUILE development that may help
> in refining goals and obstacles in the process of making GUILE the Lisp
> implementation underlying Emacs.
LOL.
Me too.
Nic
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future (was: Guile emacs thread (again)), (continued)
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/16
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mark H Weaver, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mark H Weaver, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mark H Weaver, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future,
Nic Ferrier <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, mhw, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mark H Weaver, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/17
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/09/17
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Phillip Lord, 2014/09/17