[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Oct 2014 08:54:06 +0300 |
> Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 23:24:30 -0400
> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> What is an example of a protocol that doesn't specify an encoding?
I'm not an expert, so I actually have trouble coming up with protocols
that _do_ specify an encoding. Maybe someone else could help out.
> And, of course, when you invoke a program locally, there's usually no
> protocol at all involved.
>
> Likewise, we need to look at some real cases.
Not sure what you mean by that. M-! and M-| is what I had in mind.
> You can invoke any program with M-!; I think in that case heuristic
> decoding is what users want.
But that's about 99.99% of the uses. So perhaps we are in violent
agreement after all.
> When functions run call-process on specific, what decoding is really
> right?
I don't think there's a way to know that, except in a very few
specific cases (like speller, for example). We currently use an
encoding derived from the user locale, but that's a heuristics that
has known limitations and known use cases where it simply fails (but
no better guess is available).
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mike Gerwitz, 2014/10/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/12
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Uwe Brauer, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/13