[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Oct 2014 17:36:03 +0300 |
> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden,
> address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 22:22:26 +0900
>
> Eli Zaretskii writes:
>
> > > > utf-8-emacs is a private encoding used and understood by Emacs
> > > > alone, so encoding Emacs files in that would make them unusable
> > > > (unsearchable, unreadable, etc.) with anything but Emacs.
> > >
> > > And who in the world would care?
> >
> > Those who use Grep etc. outside of Emacs.
>
> Well, no, because only those with a very special and very obsolete
> environment would be able to search for those few characters using
> grep, if they don't have Emacs. The rest of the characters are in
> Unicode, so can be searched as usual using the UTF-8 representation.
You assume that Grep and the terminal will not choke on the
non-Unicode characters. There's no basis for such an assumption.
> > > My argument is that Emacs is alone in choosing this particular
> > > "reasonable way to support encodings"
> >
> > What other programs you are aware of that cover such a large set of
> > scripts and languages no matter what is the user locale?
>
> With Unicode support, *all of them*.
Treating UTF-8 as a byte stream doesn't constitute "support".
> > My point is that those other projects need to learn from Emacs first.
>
> Could be you're right, but sadly, I doubt anyone is going to bother.
Too bad.
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/14
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Paul Eggert, 2014/10/14
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/14
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Paul Eggert, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Paul Eggert, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/14
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/14
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/15