[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64 |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Nov 2014 21:31:51 +0200 |
> From: Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 20:04:11 +0100
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> Ok. Commit to master or emacs-24?
> >
> > emacs-24, please.
>
> The patch does not apply on emacs-24 (4 hunks fail). This can be
> adapted, of course, but then there will be conflicts when merging
> emacs-24 into master. I don't like the idea of forcing someone to fix
> conflicts on areas he most probably don't know.
>
> Since this is a correctness change that solves an hypothetical future
> problem, I'm inclined to check it into master and leave emacs-24 as is.
>
> Opinions?
How about applying to both (with a suitable "don't merge to trunk"
note on emacs-24)?
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, (continued)
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Paul Eggert, 2014/11/16
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/11/16
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Paul Eggert, 2014/11/16
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Paul Eggert, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Glenn Morris, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/18
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Paul Eggert, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Paul Eggert, 2014/11/17