[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Messing with the VC history
From: |
Barry Warsaw |
Subject: |
Re: Messing with the VC history |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:47:47 -0500 |
On Nov 18, 2014, at 04:53 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>I find bisect very useful on occasion, so would rule out Type A if at all
>possible. But I find Type B plausible, and think it's a matter of taste.
bisect would be more useful, IMHO, if it followed first-parents by default.
IOW, when merging a feature branch into "mainline", I don't care whether
intermediate commits on the feature branch don't pass all their tests. I *do*
care that every commit on "mainline" passes all their tests.
>[1] However, some people think a mainline with only merge commits on
>it is pretty, and they just oppose rebasing on principle.
\o
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Messing with the VC history, (continued)
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/16
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/11/16
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/16
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/11/16
- Re: Messing with the VC history, John Yates, 2014/11/16
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/11/16
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Lars Brinkhoff, 2014/11/18
- Re: Messing with the VC history, David Kastrup, 2014/11/18
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/11/18
- Re: Messing with the VC history, David Kastrup, 2014/11/18
- Re: Messing with the VC history,
Barry Warsaw <=
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Andreas Schwab, 2014/11/18
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/11/18
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/18
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17