[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proposal: require GnuTLS 3.1.x (previous stable)
|
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
|
Subject: |
Re: proposal: require GnuTLS 3.1.x (previous stable) |
|
Date: |
Wed, 26 Nov 2014 21:33:47 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 21:13:58 -0500 Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
>> FWIW, I just got a note about this on gnutls-devel that strongly
>> suggests supporting GnuTLS 3.x only:
>> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/7811
SM> Either you posted the wrong link or we disagree about what it says.
SM> My reading of it doesn't say that we should only support GnuTLS-3.x, but
SM> that we should start supporting GnuTLS-3.x ASAP.
I guess we disagree on what it says.
Ted
- Re: proposal: require GnuTLS 3.1.x (previous stable), (continued)
- Re: proposal: require GnuTLS 3.1.x (previous stable), Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/26
- Re: proposal: require GnuTLS 3.1.x (previous stable), Peder O. Klingenberg, 2014/11/26
- Re: proposal: require GnuTLS 3.1.x (previous stable), Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/26
- Re: proposal: require GnuTLS 3.1.x (previous stable), Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/26
- Re: proposal: require GnuTLS 3.1.x (previous stable), Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/26
- Re: proposal: require GnuTLS 3.1.x (previous stable), Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/26
- Re: proposal: require GnuTLS 3.1.x (previous stable), Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/26
- Re: proposal: require GnuTLS 3.1.x (previous stable),
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: proposal: require GnuTLS 3.1.x (previous stable), Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/28
- Re: proposal: require GnuTLS 3.1.x (previous stable), Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/28
- Re: proposal: require GnuTLS 3.1.x (previous stable), Glenn Morris, 2014/11/29
- Re: proposal: require GnuTLS 3.1.x (previous stable), Michael Welsh Duggan, 2014/11/26