[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function liter
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:20:52 +0900 |
Daniel Colascione writes:
> On 01/21/2015 01:38 PM, Oleh wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is my first attempt of modifying the C source of Emacs.
> > The goal is to add a new reader syntax:
> >
> > #(foo bar) should translate to (short-lambda (foo bar))
>
> Thanks, but I'd strongly prefer not to baking this syntax into the elisp
> reader.
XEmacs is -1 on this change for the same reasons Daniel gives.
I also don't like it because the convention is to use "#c" (where c is
some character) for new syntax (eg, XEmacs uses #r"" for "rawstring
syntax", where the benefit is huge because of the unreadability of
regexps in ordinary strings).
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Daniel Colascione, 2015/01/21
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, René Kyllingstad, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, David Kastrup, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Oleh, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Daniel Colascione, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Oleh, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Daniel Colascione, 2015/01/22