[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function liter
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:49:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
René Kyllingstad <address@hidden> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:17 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>> That does not mean that I am convinced we want or need short-lambda.
>
> Both C++ and Java have "recently" added a succinct syntax for their
> equivalents.
>
> Given the amount of work it is to add features to either platform,
> quite a few people
> deemed it useful there.
>
> At least most peoples .emacs will look a bit tidier with a succinct
> anonymous lambda
> as an argument to add-hook :)
You are aware that using add-hook with ad-hoc functions is a bad idea
since it may mean that you add the same functionality several times in
case the add-hook is executed multiple times?
--
David Kastrup
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Oleh, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Artur Malabarba, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Phillip Lord, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, René Kyllingstad, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Daniel Colascione, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Daniel Colascione, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, David Kastrup, 2015/01/22
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Artur Malabarba, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Phillip Lord, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Daniel Colascione, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Oleh, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Richard Stallman, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, David Kastrup, 2015/01/23
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Richard Stallman, 2015/01/23
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2015/01/24