[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What's up with apply-partially?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: What's up with apply-partially? |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 09:54:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> I have been wondering this myself. I wonder if it was a workaround from
>> the time when lexical-binding was not activated in subr.el?
>
> Yes, I think this is the explanation. Feel free to change it,
Huh. Perhaps this causes different behavior depending on whether the
_use_ of apply-partially happens in a file with lexical-binding being
`nil'? Or the use of the function defined using it?
After all, apply-partially was first defined when lexical binding was
not available in Emacs. So some uses might depend on particular
semantics in non-lexical-binding files?
I am just blindly guessing here.
--
David Kastrup
- What's up with apply-partially?, David Kastrup, 2015/01/23
- Re: What's up with apply-partially?, Leo Liu, 2015/01/23
- Re: What's up with apply-partially?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/01/24
- Re: What's up with apply-partially?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: What's up with apply-partially?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/01/25
- [PATCH] Let apply-partially make use of lexical binding in subr.el, David Kastrup, 2015/01/25
- Re: [PATCH] Let apply-partially make use of lexical binding in subr.el, David Kastrup, 2015/01/27
- Re: [PATCH] Let apply-partially make use of lexical binding in subr.el, Stefan Monnier, 2015/01/29
- Re: [PATCH] Let apply-partially make use of lexical binding in subr.el, David Kastrup, 2015/01/29
Re: What's up with apply-partially?, Artur Malabarba, 2015/01/23