[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Defending GCC considered futile
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Defending GCC considered futile |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Feb 2015 21:27:55 +0200 |
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:41:27 +0100
>
> Most STL structures are also sort of a nuisance to examine in gdb.
Use Python or Guile for that. Python scripts to do that float around,
AFAIR.
> I don't actually have any point of comparison, but I would imagine that
> closer ties to a compiler could help here.
Red herring: GDB is as closely tied with GCC as possible in this
respect. All the problems with <optimized out> etc. are GCC
bugs/misfeatures or insufficient expressive power of DWARF debug info,
which simply cannot describe accurately enough where a variable is
held at some values of PC.
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, (continued)
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/02/09
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Richard Stallman, 2015/02/09
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Perry E. Metzger, 2015/02/09
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/02/09
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Daniel Colascione, 2015/02/10
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Helmut Eller, 2015/02/10
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/02/10
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/02/10
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Daniel Colascione, 2015/02/10
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, David Kastrup, 2015/02/10
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/02/10
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, David Kastrup, 2015/02/10
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Stefan Monnier, 2015/02/10
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/02/10
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Richard Stallman, 2015/02/11
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Richard Stallman, 2015/02/10
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, John Yates, 2015/02/10
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Perry E. Metzger, 2015/02/11
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/02/11
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Perry E. Metzger, 2015/02/11