Re: [PATCH] Fix tramp test

[Michael Albinus]

Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:

>>> Not sure what scenario are we talking about here.  Do you mean that
>>> Tramp sets LC_ALL, but the user overrides that with LC_MESSAGES?
>>
>> Yes.
>
> Note that LC_ALL has higher priority than LC_MESSAGES.

Don't know what a user does. Instead of setting LC_MESSAGES, she could
also set LC_ALL. That's why I fix it in the Tramp test; if a user
overwrites Tramp settings with something private, it's not Tramp's
problem(*).

> Andreas.

Best regards, Michael.

(*): Usually it is my problem then, handling bug reports ...