[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: desktop-buffer-info and set-buffer
|
From: |
Artur Malabarba |
|
Subject: |
Re: desktop-buffer-info and set-buffer |
|
Date: |
Sun, 1 Mar 2015 16:06:15 +0000 |
> Why waste cycles on restoring the buffer, when it will be immediately
> changed to some other buffer?
Because (by name and purpose) it looks like a function without side effects, so it's a little surprising that it has.
I don't think this would make a noticeable difference in performance, but if it's necessary for performance reasons I'll just write something on a docstring.