[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VC mode and git
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: VC mode and git |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Mar 2015 06:56:23 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> That's right. An unintended push-on-commit is *much* more likely to
> cause annoyance and damage than an unintended non-push-on-commit.
The failure to push means that the change is not installed.
This could go unnoticed for months.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: VC mode and git, (continued)
- Re: VC mode and git, Richard Stallman, 2015/03/26
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/26
- Re: VC mode and git, Paul Eggert, 2015/03/25
- Re: VC mode and git, Andreas Schwab, 2015/03/24
- Re: VC mode and git, Richard Stallman, 2015/03/25
- Re: VC mode and git, Andreas Schwab, 2015/03/25
- Re: VC mode and git, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/03/25
- Re: VC mode and git,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: VC mode and git, Richard Stallman, 2015/03/26
- Re: VC mode and git, Andreas Schwab, 2015/03/26
- Re: VC mode and git, Tassilo Horn, 2015/03/26
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/26
- Re: VC mode and git, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/03/26
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/26
- Re: VC mode and git, Richard Stallman, 2015/03/27
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/27
- Re: VC mode and git, Richard Stallman, 2015/03/28
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/28