[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: electric-pair-mode as a minor mode?
From: |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: electric-pair-mode as a minor mode? |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Apr 2015 23:43:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (João Távora) writes:
> This is why I said "inserted using message.el's message-cite-*
> mechanisms". Do these people insert their quotes using message-yank-*
> variables?
I'm not sure. I've never used any of those packages, because I think
the default way message quotes is the best. :-)
> On a related subject, I was thinking of (require 'smiley) in message.el
> to avoid a `message-smiley' variable (a list o strings), and just use
> the cars of `smiley-regexp-alist'. Can that be problematic? (especially
> because I've learned recently that changes to Emacs's Gnus are
> automatically cherry-picked to the Gnus upstream where they might break
> unexpectedly).
Requiring smiley should be unproblematic, I think.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Re: electric-pair-mode as a minor mode?, (continued)
Re: electric-pair-mode as a minor mode?, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2015/04/15
- Re: electric-pair-mode as a minor mode?, João Távora, 2015/04/16
- Re: electric-pair-mode as a minor mode?, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2015/04/16
- Re: electric-pair-mode as a minor mode?, João Távora, 2015/04/16
- Re: electric-pair-mode as a minor mode?,
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: electric-pair-mode as a minor mode?, João Távora, 2015/04/26
- Re: electric-pair-mode as a minor mode?, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2015/04/26
- Re: electric-pair-mode as a minor mode?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/26